Subscribe in a readerUpdate: Currently I am lacking time to engage in any freelance projects.
Outsourcing your web-development does not have to be a difficult experience. All projects completed by me are delivered at high quality standards. If you feel comfortable with technical details, please review the specifications below. My current main focus is on web-programming projects using PHP and Symfony, but markup and design services can also be provided.
Contact at thierryschellenbach[at]gmail.com
Quality:
Markup HTML/ CSS
- CSS based layout (table-less)
- standards compliant HTML/CSS (where possible)
- Resizable text in IE as well
- Cross browser compatible in all major browsers
- Print friendly CSS
Programming in PHP/ Symfony
- Object Oriented coding (maintainable for other programmers)
- Model View Controller pattern
- Server and Client side form validation
- Ajax where appropriate
- Rich form inputs where appropriate
- Caching
- Nice Urls (no mywebsite.com/index.php?id=45&cat=50&page=4 but mywebsite.com/electronics/computers/page/4 )
Jim Warner responded on 02 Nov 2007 at 7:27 pm #
We have developed a javascript application that enables users to select individual DOM elements from an HTML page for display. It runs on Firefox with codebase principals enabled and from an IE HTA. These approaches provide the cross-site read capability we need to extract the DOM object from an IFRAME.
To run on the WebKit browser, we have thought that developing a browser-side plugin that could communicate with the javascript might be a solution.
Your approach might be an alternative, but it sounds like it is server-based. What thoughts do you have about a project that would result in this capability for WebKit users?
Jim Warner responded on 02 Nov 2007 at 8:37 pm #
I have run the test code for Safari on Ralf Engshall’s site at
http://trainofthoughts.org/repo/export/jquery/jquery.xsajax.test.html
It seems to work as expected which is encouraging that WebKit will work with this. This test and re-reading your description of your cross-site plugin makes me realize your approach is not server-based and may be very likely to provide the cross-site read capability we need.
I have downloaded prototype and looked through the code. It looks to me that we could distribute with our code only the subset that your plugin requires, so the size will be smaller.
Then I downloaded your plugin and noted in the code your special handling of WebKit.
All in all, I am further encouraged this approach may work for us and I would most like to know why you might think it wouldn’t or what special requirements we may have to meet.
I look forward to hearing from you.