Comments on: Ten reasons why Symfony rocks - Part 2 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/ Blogging the world of IT and Business Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:38:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: scrivner http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-4068 scrivner Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:08:47 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-4068 Nice reasons :D Symfony 1.0 Rocks! And Symfony 1.1 will rocks even more! Nice reasons :D Symfony 1.0 Rocks! And Symfony 1.1 will rocks even more!

]]> By: Mellow Morning » Introducing a cross site ajax plugin for Prototype http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-401 Mellow Morning » Introducing a cross site ajax plugin for Prototype Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:13:25 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-401 [...] Ajax was my main reason to choose the prototype framework. Furthermore it is also included in the great Symfony framework. In Prototype Ajax requests are written like [...] [...] Ajax was my main reason to choose the prototype framework. Furthermore it is also included in the great Symfony framework. In Prototype Ajax requests are written like [...]

]]> By: tschellenbach http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-49 tschellenbach Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:37:14 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-49 Anyone know of a good plug in to fix Wordpress code handling behaviour for comments? Anyone know of a good plug in to fix Wordpress code handling behaviour for comments?

]]> By: hardrock http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-48 hardrock Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:22:55 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-48 Apparently my code lines have been partly erased. That should have meant: content ?> and content ?> (dots indicating inexistant spaces) Apparently my code lines have been partly erased. That should have meant:

content ?>

and

content ?>

(dots indicating inexistant spaces)

]]> By: hardrock http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-47 hardrock Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:20:06 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-47 In response to dgurba: Assuming that you have an object "article" with the property "content" (which was the case in your Rails example, but not in the symfony example) you would write just the very same in PHP: #source: http://www.symfony-project.com/tutorial/1_0/my-first-project/content ?> PHP offers this short syntax, although it may not be enabled on all configurations. And writing content ?> isn't any longer, especially if you use code completion (which any good editor should have). In response to dgurba:

Assuming that you have an object “article” with the property “content” (which was the case in your Rails example, but not in the symfony example) you would write just the very same in PHP:

#source: http://www.symfony-project.com/tutorial/1_0/my-first-project/content ?>

PHP offers this short syntax, although it may not be enabled on all configurations. And writing

content ?>

isn’t any longer, especially if you use code completion (which any good editor should have).

]]> By: rpsblog.com » A week of symfony #37 (10->16 September 2007) http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-44 rpsblog.com » A week of symfony #37 (10->16 September 2007) Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:53:27 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-44 [...] Ten reasons why Symfony rocks - Part 2 [...] [...] Ten reasons why Symfony rocks - Part 2 [...]

]]> By: superhaggis http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-35 superhaggis Sat, 15 Sep 2007 09:28:16 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-35 The blog ate part of my reply - drop in your two code examples from Symfony and Rails. The blog ate part of my reply - drop in your two code examples from Symfony and Rails.

]]> By: superhaggis http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-34 superhaggis Sat, 15 Sep 2007 09:26:57 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-34 @dgurba getRaw(’sf_content’) ?> is the placeholder for the entire template that is to be decorated with the application's layout (see layout.php); would give you the value of the 'content' property for the 'article' object. What you meant to say was getContent() ?>, which you would place in your template and setup via your action (using Symfony's default ORM - Propel). You clearly haven't used Symfony if you are making fundamental mistakes like that, so you should refrain from passing comment on it until you do. @dgurba

getRaw(’sf_content’) ?> is the placeholder for the entire template that is to be decorated with the application’s layout (see layout.php); would give you the value of the ‘content’ property for the ‘article’ object.

What you meant to say was getContent() ?>, which you would place in your template and setup via your action (using Symfony’s default ORM - Propel).

You clearly haven’t used Symfony if you are making fundamental mistakes like that, so you should refrain from passing comment on it until you do.

]]> By: dgurba http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-32 dgurba Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:10:50 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-32 I'll bite. Wouldn't symphony be rails competitor since rails came first? Since when does symphony lead the pack? It just doesn't rock as much. I'd rather *write* this (and not use some generator): #source:<a href="http://www.railsjitsu.com/blog/ruby-on-rails/using-fragment-caching-in-rails/" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.railsjitsu.com/blog<wbr></wbr>/ruby-on-rails/using-fragment<wbr></wbr>-caching-in-rails/ </a> <%= article.content %> Then this: # source: <a href="http://www.symfony-project.com/tutorial/1_0/my-first-project" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.symfony-project.com<wbr></wbr>/tutorial/1_0/my-first-project</a> <?php echo $sf_data->getRaw('sf_content') ?> The first is terse and to the point and I can maintain it easily … without language boilerplate syntax mucking up the works. why does php recommend no short_tags ... jsp, asp, php and rails use short tag religiously ... please don't make me type more. I’ll bite.

Wouldn’t symphony be rails competitor since rails came first? Since when does symphony lead the pack?

It just doesn’t rock as much.

I’d rather *write* this (and not use some generator):
#source:http://www.railsjitsu.com/blog/ruby-on-rails/using-fragment-caching-in-rails/
<%= article.content %>

Then this:
# source: http://www.symfony-project.com/tutorial/1_0/my-first-project
<?php echo $sf_data->getRaw(’sf_content’) ?>

The first is terse and to the point and I can maintain it easily … without language boilerplate syntax mucking up the works.
why does php recommend no short_tags … jsp, asp, php and rails use short tag religiously … please don’t make me type more.

]]> By: Rob Roy http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-20 Rob Roy Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:47:14 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-20 A bit more on performance. At the recent Symfony Camp Fabien Potencier spoke at length about the major refactoring in progress for version 1.1 and 2.0. While he would only promise V2.0 "when it's done", he said he was expecting a 4 to 5 times performance increase for Symfony 2.0. A bit more on performance. At the recent Symfony Camp Fabien Potencier spoke at length about the major refactoring in progress for version 1.1 and 2.0. While he would only promise V2.0 “when it’s done”, he said he was expecting a 4 to 5 times performance increase for Symfony 2.0.

]]> By: tschellenbach http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-16 tschellenbach Tue, 11 Sep 2007 06:53:24 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-16 Very true, still had a bit of trouble with Wordpress. It is actually not too friendly for posting code, need to learn how to get it in control and leave my spaces alone. Very true, still had a bit of trouble with Wordpress. It is actually not too friendly for posting code, need to learn how to get it in control and leave my spaces alone.

]]> By: halfer http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-15 halfer Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:14:14 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-15 Don't forget that the yaml file for component configuration must be indented appropriately. It may be a browser issue, but on FF2 it looks like you have no indentation at all :o( Don’t forget that the yaml file for component configuration must be indented appropriately. It may be a browser issue, but on FF2 it looks like you have no indentation at all :o(

]]> By: tschellenbach http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-14 tschellenbach Sun, 09 Sep 2007 09:10:09 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-14 Very true, I had a look at that while writing, but then totally forgot about it. Good point! Very true, I had a look at that while writing, but then totally forgot about it. Good point!

]]> By: Myke http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-13 Myke Sun, 09 Sep 2007 02:08:13 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-13 There is already a plugin for using memcache as your caching layer. http://trac.symfony-project.com/trac/wiki/sfMemcachePlugin There is already a plugin for using memcache as your caching layer.

http://trac.symfony-project.com/trac/wiki/sfMemcachePlugin

]]> By: Mellow Morning » Ten reasons why Symfony rocks - Part 1 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-12 Mellow Morning » Ten reasons why Symfony rocks - Part 1 Sat, 08 Sep 2007 20:05:11 +0000 http://www.mellowmorning.com/2007/09/08/ten-reasons-why-symfony-rocks-part-2/#comment-12 [...] Update: Part 2 has been published: Ten Reasons why Symfony rocks - part 2 [...] [...] Update: Part 2 has been published: Ten Reasons why Symfony rocks - part 2 [...]

]]>